Kindergarten careers advice

Embed from Getty Images

Henrietta Cook in The Age is reporting that the Victorian government intends to introduce careers advice from the age of twelve.

I am not opposed to such an idea. Often, many students have little idea of what is out there and available for them. However, the ensuing discussion demonstrates just what a muddle we have managed to find ourselves in when discussing the relationship between the education system and work.

In Year 9, students will be psychometrically tested, presumably to figure out something about the kind of career that will suit them. Hopefully this will be more valid than the dreaded Myers-Briggs test. A student in the article suggests that her peers, unsure of what their future holds, are aiming at breadth rather than depth of study.

But, why wouldn’t they? Especially when we have Jan Owen AM, CEO of the Foundation for Young Australians, suggesting that primary school children should receive career advice because, “A 15 year-old will have 17 jobs in five different industries. When it comes to being exposed to the world of work, the earlier the better.” If so, breadth is exactly what is required?

Owen’s statement is the quintessence of the kind of fashionable crystal-ball gazing that education commentators indulge in. It is impossible to know how many careers an 15 year-old will have. At least its incongruous precision has the benefit of highlighting the absurdity of such remarks.

However, there is also a contradiction there. If we accept Owen’s figures at face value, what exactly are we going to be saying to these primary school children when we give them careers advice?

“What do you want to do when you grow up? Never mind, you’re six, right? That means that, according to my calculations, you’ll have 21 jobs in six-and-a-half different industries. Don’t suggest which ones. They don’t exist yet. Here, do a psychometric test. It doesn’t matter what it says.”

The only thing that is certain about the future is that it is unpredictable. That’s why I have previously suggested that the best preparation for young people is to equip them with the knowledge that has been useful in the past; that which has endured. Not all of this knowledge will be economically valuable to them, but education is about more that simply preparation for work. It is also about living a fulfilling life. Regardless, I can’t think of a way of deciding on a better curriculum to teach without already knowing the future. If we build a curriculum on wrong predictions, there is a much greater risk of leaving students without knowledge they later find out that they need.


6 thoughts on “Kindergarten careers advice

  1. I liked the paragraph on what experts think meaningful career advice provides. It is basically a tautology, e.g. “it helps them find work”. Wow the experts nailed that one!

    Part of the problems cited seem like very basic lack of info that should be on the web or in simple pamphlets for students choosing high school courses.

    As usual there didn’t seem to be a cost benefit plan for how to spend everyone’s time.

  2. The people who offer the advice about changing industries are pretty much invariably people who have stayed in a pretty narrow range. I don’t know anyone who has worked in five different industries. Not a single one. It’s rot.

      1. I have worked in 5 or more. Newspaper industry – delivering papers, Construction – student job as builders labourer, barman, agriculture various picking and planting jobs, etc.

        Worked in verses had a career in are very different. Where I work everyone has been in the same career since graduating – ranging from 1 to 40 years worth. We are either boring or doing something we love but nothing is driving us to change career.

  3. “Often, many students have little idea of what is out there and available for them.”

    Neither do most adults. I’ve met plenty of people who think the only job available to someone with a maths degree is that of maths teacher.

  4. I came across a scary interview with an academic who was pointing out that we now have a generation that has no knowledge so cannot think. They are a generation who believe information can be found instantly on the internet and that therefore nothing needs to be learnt. If this is so, then the loss of knowledge has begun and whist current ideas such as teaching skills for jobs that don’t exist yet persist then there is no end to this loss of knowledge and the consequent disempowerment of the majority of the population. Sorry I cannot give a source for the interview, it was a news interview in UK on 28 July.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.