Teachers to have no role in “The Inaugural Mark Colvin Conversation”, despite it being about schools

Embed from Getty Images

On the 3rd of June, the City Recital Hall in Sydney will host a conversation. Inspired by the spirit of the late broadcaster, Mark Colvin, panellists will consider the vexed question of whether schools and society are stifling or encouraging creativity (according to the title) or whether they are fostering or stifling imagination (according to the description).

The panellists include Megan Washington, a musician; Lucy Clark, a journalist at The Guardian Australia who has written a book about education; Benjamin Law, a journalist who wrote a book that went on to form the basis of a sitcom; and Robyn Ewing, an academic most notable for criticising systematic synthetic phonics. The panel will be chaired by Julia Zemiro, whose day job involves hosting a music quiz and interviewing people.

I have no objection to any one of these people appearing on such a panel and talking about schools. My objection is to the one, glaring, stinking, thunderous absence; that of any teachers.

Presumably, we are just not interesting enough. Presumably, the organisers think they are more likely to attract a crowd if they get musicians and journalists to talk about schools instead of teachers. From the published work of those involved, it also seems a done deal that the answer to the question will be the obvious and lazy one; that schools do indeed kill creativity. Despite being false, this has been a popular truthy meme dating back at least as far as Ken Robinson’s famous TED Talk on the same topic. I would be surprised if there is any challenge.

I cannot comment on whether talking about schools at the same time as silencing teachers is in the spirit of the late Mark Colvin, because I am unfamiliar with his work. But if it is not, then the organisers have done him a disservice.

It is a latent form of contempt that leaves teachers out of education discussions. It must change.


11 thoughts on “Teachers to have no role in “The Inaugural Mark Colvin Conversation”, despite it being about schools

  1. Of course, including a cognitive scientist or psychologist who can present the evidence of what we know about creativity would kill off the party before it started. Rather like the debate about 21st Century skills – a non-debate when we acknowledge the science.

      1. It is an interesting point.

        Teacher’s rightly argue that they should have a major role in curriculum development, but they are not researchers in curriculum development. So should they be excluded from the conversation and only those involved in research in policy and curriculum be the ones involved in curriculum development? Of course not.

        To dismiss an individuals’ experience as a classroom teacher as they are now an academic involved in research of classroom practice and the ‘teaching of ’ initial teacher preparation, is no different.

        It could be argued such an individual has a wider knowledge and awareness of the issues as they come from both a practitioners perspective as well as a research/academic perspective.

        Too often these discussions involve no educators. I, for one, welcome an experienced teacher and academic – even if I do not always agree with their perspectives.

        There is a very different discussion that can lead from this. What is an ‘expert’ and who decides?

    1. I would have no problem with any of these being a member of such a panel. In fact, from reading the blurb of her book, I think one of the two journalists is speaking partly from a parent’s perspective.

  2. All we will end up with is a discussion based on recollections of panel members’ own school days, and those probably coloured by distorted memories, selective recall, and the usuall colouring we give our pasts….right next door to useless, IMO.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.