A ‘neoliberal imaginary’ or imaginary neoliberals?

Embed from Getty Images

Let’s run a thought experiment.

E. D. Hirsch Junior, Daniel Wild of the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) and an education academic are in the pub.

Hirsch argues the case for a strong national curriculum full of the kind of knowledge that allows people to read and understand quality sources of information such as broadsheet newspapers. He argues that this is necessary to level the playing-field between the rich and the poor and marginalised.

Daniel Wild scoffs at Hirsch’s idea:

“Government should be looking at vouchers, more decentralisation and whether we even need a national curriculum. That should be up to schools. The state should not be responsible for curriculum.”

The education academic sits there, puzzled. Who should he call a ‘neoliberal‘?

On the one hand, Wild seems to have a neoliberal concern for a small state and for allowing markets as much free-reign as possible. And yet a key feature distinguishing neoliberalism from libertarianism (and some interpretations of classical liberalism) is that it is not completely laissez-faire. To neoliberals, the state has a role in setting standards and for regulating markets – let’s call it the ‘European Community’ model of neoliberalism. Hirsch’s national curriculum could be seen as such a list of standards. Perhaps government might be tempted to centrally mandate a set of assessments against these standards. But don’t be fooled into thinking this is big state social democracy, even if it’s legislated by a left-of-centre political party, because standardised testing is, you’ve guessed it, neoliberal.

So you could argue it any way you want. The key point is that both Hirsch’s and Wild’s positions are ones that the academic is likely to disagree with. So if you find something you don’t like, you can call it ‘neoliberal’ and your position is essentially unfalsifiable.

And so the neat idea of neoliberalism rushed like a grass fire through the literature.

Unfortunately, Donald Trump then turned up with a fire truck. Whatever neoliberalism is, it has always been associated with the classical liberalism of free trade and globalisation, something that Trump, with his tariffs and trade wars, has set himself against. But Trump is really bad so surely we can call him a neoliberal? Apparently not.

Despite faltering on Trump, and despite the failure to be clear about exactly what neoliberalism is, sociologists have found it useful to construct the concept of the ‘neoliberal imaginary‘. This is a kind of thought world that neoliberals and even wider society are trapped within, unable to perceive alternative truths or realities. The extent to which you believe that there are multiple alternative social truths depends on your commitment to relativism. What is clear is that whether the neoliberal imaginary represents a mistaken set of ideas, or whether it represents an alternative set of truths, it is bad. Real bad.

A neoliberal imaginary made up of imaginary neoliberals. A sociological conspiracy theory for our time.


2 thoughts on “A ‘neoliberal imaginary’ or imaginary neoliberals?

  1. But then the educational academic thinks: “hmmm…perhaps if we could use charter schools sponsored by educational technology companies to bring competition to the educational marketplace and promote 21st century skills through innovative teaching methods and entrepreneurship, students could then participate in the new global community and develop their personalized areas of preference.”

  2. A great post as always Greg! I’m in the first year of a doctorate and as a result I’ve read a lot of Bourdieus and Foucaults and it’s a little bit like reading the notes of Orwell and Huxley. Sociologists are so keen to point the finger at ‘power’ and it’s a little worrying. I thought the labelling of prog or trad was OTT on Twitter, but academics manage to step up the BS by sitting in camps of ‘Bourdieusian’ or ‘Foucauldian’ sophistry that will happily make a straw man of anything or anyone that doesn’t believe they exist. After all, you’re either one of the good guys out of the matrix or one of the ignorant evil guys in it. The constant concern of academics pointing out evil is tiresome and self-fulfilling and I hope, one day, they can deconstruct their neoliberalism and other platitudes into something that’ll actually do some good.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.