School subjected to public shaming given boost by inspectors

Embed from Getty Images

In September 2017, Great Yarmouth High School in England became Great Yarmouth Charter Academy (GYCA) under the leadership of Barry Smith, as part of the Inspiration Trust chain of academies. I have never met Barry, but I have known him for some time through Twitter and blogging. He is a powerful voice arguing for explicit teaching and strong behaviour policies.

Almost immediately, Barry and GYCA were subjected to an online shaming campaign (I won’t provide links to Twitter trolls). School documents were published on Twitter and the minutiae of school policies were pored over by commentators who took little account of context. On the other side of the world, an Australian behaviour expert took the time to blog an attack on the school and on Barry.

No doubt, this is linked to the fact that Barry Smith previously worked at Michaela Community School, another school subjected to an online shaming campaign for its refusal to conform to the expectations of educationalists.

It is now clear that innovative schools like GYCA face constant pressure to water down their approach, even if it is working. Prompted by the online campaign against the school, Ofsted, the English schools’ inspectorate, initiated an unannounced visit.

The results of Ofsted’s visit have now been published and they are a credit to Barry and his team. Some quotes:

“A large number of pupils told inspectors that, prior to the introduction of the school’s revised behaviour policy at the beginning of the current academic year, they often felt unsafe at school. They described ‘dangerous’ behaviour in corridors and during breaks from lessons, including regular fights, and said that abusive language was very common. Pupils explained that, very often, serious disruption during lessons prevented them from learning anything at all. Some said that in the past, they had ‘dreaded’, and in consequence sometimes avoided, coming to school because of these fears. Teachers and other staff told inspectors that they often found it difficult to teach because behaviour was so poor, that they were frequently the target of verbal, and occasionally of physical abuse, and that at times they too felt unsafe.

During this unannounced inspection, all of the large number of pupils who spoke with inspectors said that they now feel safe at school. Pupils moved around the school site in an orderly manner and behaved very politely and respectfully to their peers and to adults. They wore their uniform with pride, arrived at lessons promptly, and settled down to learning quickly. In all lessons visited, learning took place in a calm and orderly environment. Relationships between pupils and teachers were positive, and consequently pupils had the confidence to ask and to answer questions. Pupils behaved well, both when interacting with their teachers and when working on their own. As a result, they worked hard, completing tasks in a focused manner. During break periods, pupils socialised with each other amicably.”

I would suggest that keeping staff and students safe is the first priority of any school.

The report goes on to discuss the falling number of incidents of repeated disruption and severe misconduct. It says that exclusions, although still high, are falling. Apparently, ‘Staff and pupils attribute the improvements to leaders’ introduction of a new behaviour policy at the start of the current academic year.’ This is the same policy that drew such ire from armchair critics. In particular, it seems that GYCA had, and still has to some extent, a problem with attendance, both with students coming to school and with students skipping lessons. In this light, it is understandable that the school sought to keep students in lessons as much as possible as part of the new behaviour policy.

It would be good to think that this will quieten the critics. I doubt that. If being proved resoundingly wrong had ever had an effect on the proponents of flawed educational ideas then we wouldn’t be in the mess we find ourselves in today. No doubt Ofsted will be an enemy now that it has found the wrong things.

For its part, GYCA will need to stay alert. Critics will be looking out for any lever they can pull to exert pressure on this heretic school. But, for now at least, staff and students can congratulate themselves on the end of the beginning and on a job well done.

End note: The report also states, ‘Teachers and pupils told inspectors that in their view, the behaviour policy is applied with due regard to individual needs. Such an approach was evident during the inspection.’ This is why I think it is mistaken for proponents and critics to refer to these schools as ‘no excuses’.


7 thoughts on “School subjected to public shaming given boost by inspectors

    1. Agreed. It’s quite possible they ditched it and toned down the extreme stuff. If it really is a “no excuses” school, and the kids feel relaxed in that environment, then so much the better for them.

  1. an Australian behaviour expert took the time to blog an attack on the school and on Barry.

    I read her blog post. Her criticism was aimed at the content of the school document that was published online.

    1. Probably the most presumptuous comment she made was “In a bid to out-do his old school”. Besides that, it’s all based on what was written in the document.

  2. You have two ways to improve the culture of a school. Persistent small improvements can work, provided the staff will work alongside management.

    But if the problem is partly staff, who decline to maintain standards, then something more drastic is needed. A seemingly draconian policy change will often get those staff to move on voluntarily. A strong signal that things are about to change is helpful. Hence some new principals make changes that seem draconian on the surface.

    Yes, staff are the main barrier to improving discipline. The lazy, the incompetent and — the biggest group — those who don’t believe in firmness, can destroy an otherwise good system.

    You need to be actually in a school to know how and why a policy has been enacted. Shaming it from outside without knowledge is plain stupid.

  3. I find all of this fascinating. The critisism that schools like this attract is as a direct result of them being bold and promoting openly to the world what they do. And the educational commenters who criticise often have little grasp on the reality of life in typical secondary schools across the UK. The happy reality is that there are many schools that are successfully implementing the approaches that MCS and GYCA talk about as well as other approaches that are appropriate to their context. But they just get on with it quietly without the active publicity. I am very happy to work in one such school that had been turned around by clear policies and high expectations driven by strong management. I could write many a blog post on what we are doing, but why bother? I’d rather just get on with improving the school I work in.

    1. Interesting point: why bother?

      Michaela have certainly sought publicity with their public debates and book. I’m not sure how actively GYCA have gone after publicity – it may just be that the baying mob that Michaela provoked have followed Barry to GYCA and made common cause with some disgruntled parents.

      But I do think this serves a purpose. Teachers who are trapped in schools with dire behaviour need to know that there is nothing inevitable about this; that they could move school or perhaps, if they have the influence, adopt policies that will make their school better.

      I remember hearing about Ninestiles in Birmingham many years ago and being surprised and thrilled at what they were able to do at that time.

      Of course, this is why such schools are subjected to vicious campaigns: the fear of contagion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.