In my last three posts, I took a look at the PISA data sitting behind the recent, “Ten questions…” report.
In the comments, Christian Bokhove provided a link to the working paper that the report drew upon. A number of things stood out.
For instance, on page 74 there is a box explaining fully how “index of memorisation” was calculated. After reading the “Ten questions…” report, I was concerned about what the alternatives were to the memorisation responses and I was right to be. I think this is an extremely weak construct.
The most stunning thing that I have found, however, is PISA’s definition of good teaching:
“In its Analytical Framework (OECD, 2013), PISA defines the three dimensions of good teaching as: clear, well-structured classroom management; supportive, student-oriented classroom climate; and cognitive activation with challenging content (Klieme et al, 2009; Baumert et al, 2010; Lipowsky et al, 2009; Kunter et al 2008).” My emphasis.
It may now seem less surprising that PISA haven’t highlight the following relationship in their own data, even though they have pointed out weaker correlations in the same data set:
10 thoughts on “The PISA definition of good teaching ”
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.
You report the variance 0.58. Therefore a correlation ~ -0.76?
Thank you for your work, it is very usefull.
Could you please define exactly students oriented classroom climate ? And what are the 4 questions ?
Thank you again and I am sorry if the answers are in some previous posts
I can’t define it. Sorry. You would need to look at the PISA materials.
Pingback: PISA comprehensively proves itself wrong | Filling the pail
I don’t understand your point. All education should be ‘student-oriented’. It is indeed the student that has got to learn, not anyone else. So you even can out the word ‘good’ in the definition.
Pingback: PISA’s proves itself wrong… again. | Filling the pail
Pingback: Three myths about PISA | Filling the pail
Pingback: Five ways to damage a good school | Filling the pail
Pingback: Is Singapore winning the wrong race? | Filling the pail