If I were setting up a website to sell alternative medicines then I would make sure that I packed it full of testimonials. As the doctors over at Quackwatch explain:
“Most people who think they have been helped by an unorthodox method enjoy sharing their success stories with their friends. People who give such testimonials are usually motivated by a sincere wish to help their fellow humans. Rarely do they realize how difficult it is to evaluate a “health” product on the basis of personal experience… the average person who feels better after taking a product will not be able to rule out coincidence (spontaneous remission)—or the placebo effect (feeling better because he thinks he has taken a positive step). Since we tend to believe what others tell us of personal experiences, testimonials can be powerful persuaders. Despite their unreliability, they are the cornerstone of the quack’s success.”
So testimonials are highly persuasive. But they are also potentially misleading and anecdotal. They do not substitute for proper empirical evidence.
We should be particularly wary of the use of testimonials to promote teaching methods. Teaching is applied psychology and our own subjective experiences of it are likely to be highly biased. The empirical evidence in education is flawed and incomplete but we should not make claims that ignore or dismiss it in favour of personal testimony.
This duty is particularly beholden on those who seek to change the way that we teach. Grand claims that teaching needs a revolution – the kinds of claims made by the 21st century skills movement – need to be grounded in evidence not rationalisation. We need to know that ‘entrepreneurship’ is a thing that can be taught and that teaching it leads to positive, measurable outcomes. Otherwise it’s just like homeopathy.
Dan Meyer is well-known in the field of maths education. He has made strong claims – notably in a popular TED talk – that we need to change the way that we teach maths. I have criticised these claims as lacking evidence and Meyer has disputed this.
Meyer recently wrote an interesting blog post in which he took a few swipes at his critics whilst valorising personal testimonials. He described his own blog:
“But I had to testify. That’s what this has always been – a testimonial – where by “this” I mean this blog, these tasks, and my career in math education to date.”
I am afraid that those who seek to influence educators need to do much better than this. Education is starting to change. If you can’t point to the evidence – if you just want to supply a testimonial – then why should we listen?